nuxtjs支持api接口,serverMiddleware

2020-02-22 17:57:05

参考地址 Sending emails through Nuxt.js

Who can’t relate to this: You’ve built a small portfolio page for someone, maybe a company, a friend or yourself. And the only API endpoint you’d need is one for a form. What now? Scaffolding a new service just for this one endpoint?

Fear no more! It’s possible to send emails almost directly through Nuxt but only in SSR mode with a Node.js server running. No more additional API server necessary if you just want to send a mail with data coming from a contact form.

Before diving into the implementation and ideas behind it, here is the full source code I’m referring to through this blog post. It’s from my company’s website developmint.de.

The main goal was a simple API endpoint accessible through Nuxt.js to handle the three contact form fields (nameemail and message) and to send an email with the data if everything is alright.

 Let’s get it on - serverMiddleware

While developing the redirect-module for Nuxt, I came in touch with serverMiddleware. Those run before the actual vue-server-renderer and are usually used for handling static assets, forcing HTTPS or, in case of redirect-module, rewriting routes.

But as they are highly customizable and flexible, why not use them as endpoints instead?

This is possible. An example middleware could look like this:

export default (req, res) => {
    res.write('Hey!')
    res.end()}

When saved to app/test.js for example, you can then add it to your Nuxt config:

export default {
  // ...
  serverMiddleware: [
    { path: '/api/test', handler: '~/api/test' },
  ],
  // ...}

If you rebuild your project in dev mode (yarn run dev) and visit /api/test, you can see Hey! as the page content. Great!

So we can use server middleware to serve content… But there must be a drawback, right?

Right (one could think…)

As Nuxt uses connect as middleware layer (to reduce overhead as it suffices the complexity needed), we are missing some “critical” features in comparison to express.

Besides typical convenience features and routing (which isn’t even mandatory in our case), we can’t get the passed parameters from our req object at the moment. Without those, there is no content for our contact form mail. So what now?

We could use the body-parser package and apply it to the route before we use our custom middleware but then we’d face more “problems” like decoding JSON or setting headers “correctly” sooner or later. Likely it would work from a certain point on but there must be a better way. If we could just use express

 Express in Nuxt.js?

Possibly you have heard it the other way: An express app with Nuxt.js as renderer (like in express-template).

But did you know that you can use express inside a serverMiddleware?

import express from 'express'const app = express()app.post('/', (req, res) => {
    // Validate, sanitize and send})export default {
  path: '/api/contact',
  handler: app}

We declare the express app as the middleware handler and Nuxt is magically gluing everything together.

Now we can save this short snippet under api/contact.js and register our custom server middleware only as path string (because path and handler are inside).

export default {
  // ...
  serverMiddleware: [
    '~/api/contact'
  ],
  // ...}

 Still missing: the mailer!

The last coding part might be less spectacular for everybody who already set up nodemailer in an express app.

Fun fact: Before this implementation I did not as I mostly write backends in Laravel (♥️).

 Inserting the body-parser

Since version 4.16.0, express has its own JSON middleware based on body-parser. To get our JSON parameters out of the POST body, we will need it:

import express from 'express'import nodemailer from 'nodemailer'const app = express()app.use(express.json())// ...

 Validate and sanitize

Now we can get back to our post route. You may wonder why it’s declared as / instead of /api/contact. That’s because our express app’s base route is /api/contact (set through the path export).

import express from 'express'import validator from 'validator'import xssFilters from 'xss-filters'const app = express()app.use(express.json())app.post('/', (req, res) => {
  const attributes = ['name', 'email', 'msg'] // Our three form fields, all required

  // Map each attribute name to the validated and sanitized equivalent (false if validation failed)
  const sanitizedAttributes = attributes.map(n => validateAndSanitize(n, req.body[n]))

  // True if some of the attributes new values are false -> validation failed
  const someInvalid = sanitizedAttributes.some(r => !r)

  if (someInvalid) {
    // Throw a 422 with a neat error message if validation failed
    return res.status(422).json({ 'error': 'Ugh.. That looks unprocessable!' })
  }

  // Upcoming here: sending the mail})

Let’s take a look at the validateAndSanitize function. It could be replaced with another express middleware or plugin but why not writing our own this time:

const rejectFunctions = new Map([
  [ 'name', v => v.length < 4 ],
  [ 'email', v => !validator.isEmail(v) ],
  [ 'msg', v => v.length < 25 ]])const validateAndSanitize = (key, value) => {
  // If map has key and function returns false, return sanitized input. Else, return false
  return rejectFunctions.has(key) && !rejectFunctions.get(key)(value) && xssFilters.inHTMLData(value)}

Each possible attribute receives a rejectFunction that defines in which case the validation will fail. If the function returns false, the validation passed. It looks weird first but I like the reversed approach here because we can avoid a cascade of ifs.

 Send it out

After validating and sanitizing, we are confident that we can send the mail out!



 















import express from 'express'import nodemailer from 'nodemailer'import validator from 'validator'import xssFilters from 'xss-filters'// ...app.post('/', (req, res) => {
  // ...

  if (someInvalid) {
    return res.status(422).json({ 'error': 'Ugh.. That looks unprocessable!' })
  }

  sendMail(...sanitizedAttributes)
  res.status(200).json({ 'message': 'OH YEAH' })})

We use the ES6 spread syntax to pass the sanitized values to the sendMail function:

const sendMail = (name, email, msg) => {
  const transporter = nodemailer.createTransport({
    sendmail: true,
    newline: 'unix',
    path: '/usr/sbin/sendmail'
  })
  transporter.sendMail({
    from: email,
    to: 'support@developmint.de',
    subject: 'New contact form message',
    text: msg  })}

Inside we create a nodemailer transporter and send the email out. We could do this through SMTP, other providers (eg. SES) or (classically) through sendmail as I did. If you want to know more about the setup of nodemailer, here you go.

 Finally we can send emails - A conclusion

So, we did it! If we now send a POST request (eg with axios) through our form, the email will be sent.

Was it worth it? - Definitely! Instead of blocking another port for such a simple API, we can run it together with our Nuxt server (in SSR mode).

Should I adapt my whole API to leverage Nuxt server middleware now? - You could do this, but I would rather not recommend it, as pointed out in a recent article. It’s a great solution for simple and small APIs, but as soon as complexity or the request count increases, better go with own API servers (not only because of performance, also because of better scalability and no “single point of failure”).

 Closing remarks

I hope you enjoyed the article! If so it’d be cool if you could spread the word ☺️

Questions left? Critics? Hit me up on Twitter (@TheAlexLichter) or write me a mail (blog at lichter dot io). I’m curious to hear from you!


  • 2019-09-26 18:57:29

    Java中数组怎么深度复制

    有时候循环进行一些操作,放入list,发现,list中的数据都是一个数据,这就尴尬了,我们需要深度复制,才能解决这个问题。或者生成新的,也就是深度复制。

  • 2019-09-26 19:03:33

    spring post jackson的反序列化需要无参构造函数

    JSON parse error: Cannot construct instance of `com.**` (although at least one Creator exists): cannot deserialize from Object value (no delegate- or property-based Creator); nested exception is com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.exc.MismatchedInputException: Cannot construct instance of `com.**` (although at least one Creator exists): cannot deserialize from Object value (no delegate- or property-based Creator)  at [Source: (PushbackInputStream); line: 2, column: 2]] ———————————————— 版权声明:本文为CSDN博主「冰夏之夜影」的原创文章,遵循 CC 4.0 BY-SA 版权协议,转载请附上原文出处链接及本声明。 原文链接:https://blog.csdn.net/u011561335/article/details/91346777

  • 2019-09-26 21:46:36

    Shiro整合JWT+Token过期刷新,demo,详解

    最近使用SpringBoot集成Shiro,JWT快速搭建了一个后台系统,Shiro前面已经使用过,JWT(JSON Web Tokens)是一种用于安全的传递信息而采用的一种标准。Web系统中,我们使用加密的Json来生成Token在服务端与客户端无状态传输,代替了之前常用的Session。 系统采用Redis作为缓存,解决Token过期更新的问题,同时集成SSO登录,完整过程这里来总结一下。

  • 2019-09-26 21:48:15

    解决UEditor超出最大字数后只提示不限制的问题

    最近项目用到百度额UEditor文本编辑器,今天测试向我提出了一个问题。就是在输入的文字超过默认的最大字数限制之后,虽然提示“字数超过最大范围,服务器可能拒绝保存”,但是仍然可以点击保存按钮进行保存。

  • 2019-09-27 14:49:33

    Google Guava介绍和体检

    JDK提供的String还不够好么?也许还不够友好,至少让我们用起来还不够爽,还得操心!举个栗子,比如String提供的split方法,我们得关心空字符串吧,还得考虑返回的结果中存在null元素吧,只提供了前后trim的方法(如果我想对中间元素进行trim呢)。

  • 2019-09-28 00:03:21

    shiro的session共享,持久化

     shiro的session创建与session的查询、更新、过期、删除中,shiro对session的操作基本都讲到了,但还缺一个session共享没有讲解;session共享的原理其实在自定义session管理一文已经讲过了,本文不讲原理,只看看shiro的session共享的实现。