nuxtjs支持api接口,serverMiddleware

2020-02-22 17:57:05

参考地址 Sending emails through Nuxt.js

Who can’t relate to this: You’ve built a small portfolio page for someone, maybe a company, a friend or yourself. And the only API endpoint you’d need is one for a form. What now? Scaffolding a new service just for this one endpoint?

Fear no more! It’s possible to send emails almost directly through Nuxt but only in SSR mode with a Node.js server running. No more additional API server necessary if you just want to send a mail with data coming from a contact form.

Before diving into the implementation and ideas behind it, here is the full source code I’m referring to through this blog post. It’s from my company’s website developmint.de.

The main goal was a simple API endpoint accessible through Nuxt.js to handle the three contact form fields (nameemail and message) and to send an email with the data if everything is alright.

 Let’s get it on - serverMiddleware

While developing the redirect-module for Nuxt, I came in touch with serverMiddleware. Those run before the actual vue-server-renderer and are usually used for handling static assets, forcing HTTPS or, in case of redirect-module, rewriting routes.

But as they are highly customizable and flexible, why not use them as endpoints instead?

This is possible. An example middleware could look like this:

export default (req, res) => {
    res.write('Hey!')
    res.end()}

When saved to app/test.js for example, you can then add it to your Nuxt config:

export default {
  // ...
  serverMiddleware: [
    { path: '/api/test', handler: '~/api/test' },
  ],
  // ...}

If you rebuild your project in dev mode (yarn run dev) and visit /api/test, you can see Hey! as the page content. Great!

So we can use server middleware to serve content… But there must be a drawback, right?

Right (one could think…)

As Nuxt uses connect as middleware layer (to reduce overhead as it suffices the complexity needed), we are missing some “critical” features in comparison to express.

Besides typical convenience features and routing (which isn’t even mandatory in our case), we can’t get the passed parameters from our req object at the moment. Without those, there is no content for our contact form mail. So what now?

We could use the body-parser package and apply it to the route before we use our custom middleware but then we’d face more “problems” like decoding JSON or setting headers “correctly” sooner or later. Likely it would work from a certain point on but there must be a better way. If we could just use express

 Express in Nuxt.js?

Possibly you have heard it the other way: An express app with Nuxt.js as renderer (like in express-template).

But did you know that you can use express inside a serverMiddleware?

import express from 'express'const app = express()app.post('/', (req, res) => {
    // Validate, sanitize and send})export default {
  path: '/api/contact',
  handler: app}

We declare the express app as the middleware handler and Nuxt is magically gluing everything together.

Now we can save this short snippet under api/contact.js and register our custom server middleware only as path string (because path and handler are inside).

export default {
  // ...
  serverMiddleware: [
    '~/api/contact'
  ],
  // ...}

 Still missing: the mailer!

The last coding part might be less spectacular for everybody who already set up nodemailer in an express app.

Fun fact: Before this implementation I did not as I mostly write backends in Laravel (♥️).

 Inserting the body-parser

Since version 4.16.0, express has its own JSON middleware based on body-parser. To get our JSON parameters out of the POST body, we will need it:

import express from 'express'import nodemailer from 'nodemailer'const app = express()app.use(express.json())// ...

 Validate and sanitize

Now we can get back to our post route. You may wonder why it’s declared as / instead of /api/contact. That’s because our express app’s base route is /api/contact (set through the path export).

import express from 'express'import validator from 'validator'import xssFilters from 'xss-filters'const app = express()app.use(express.json())app.post('/', (req, res) => {
  const attributes = ['name', 'email', 'msg'] // Our three form fields, all required

  // Map each attribute name to the validated and sanitized equivalent (false if validation failed)
  const sanitizedAttributes = attributes.map(n => validateAndSanitize(n, req.body[n]))

  // True if some of the attributes new values are false -> validation failed
  const someInvalid = sanitizedAttributes.some(r => !r)

  if (someInvalid) {
    // Throw a 422 with a neat error message if validation failed
    return res.status(422).json({ 'error': 'Ugh.. That looks unprocessable!' })
  }

  // Upcoming here: sending the mail})

Let’s take a look at the validateAndSanitize function. It could be replaced with another express middleware or plugin but why not writing our own this time:

const rejectFunctions = new Map([
  [ 'name', v => v.length < 4 ],
  [ 'email', v => !validator.isEmail(v) ],
  [ 'msg', v => v.length < 25 ]])const validateAndSanitize = (key, value) => {
  // If map has key and function returns false, return sanitized input. Else, return false
  return rejectFunctions.has(key) && !rejectFunctions.get(key)(value) && xssFilters.inHTMLData(value)}

Each possible attribute receives a rejectFunction that defines in which case the validation will fail. If the function returns false, the validation passed. It looks weird first but I like the reversed approach here because we can avoid a cascade of ifs.

 Send it out

After validating and sanitizing, we are confident that we can send the mail out!



 















import express from 'express'import nodemailer from 'nodemailer'import validator from 'validator'import xssFilters from 'xss-filters'// ...app.post('/', (req, res) => {
  // ...

  if (someInvalid) {
    return res.status(422).json({ 'error': 'Ugh.. That looks unprocessable!' })
  }

  sendMail(...sanitizedAttributes)
  res.status(200).json({ 'message': 'OH YEAH' })})

We use the ES6 spread syntax to pass the sanitized values to the sendMail function:

const sendMail = (name, email, msg) => {
  const transporter = nodemailer.createTransport({
    sendmail: true,
    newline: 'unix',
    path: '/usr/sbin/sendmail'
  })
  transporter.sendMail({
    from: email,
    to: 'support@developmint.de',
    subject: 'New contact form message',
    text: msg  })}

Inside we create a nodemailer transporter and send the email out. We could do this through SMTP, other providers (eg. SES) or (classically) through sendmail as I did. If you want to know more about the setup of nodemailer, here you go.

 Finally we can send emails - A conclusion

So, we did it! If we now send a POST request (eg with axios) through our form, the email will be sent.

Was it worth it? - Definitely! Instead of blocking another port for such a simple API, we can run it together with our Nuxt server (in SSR mode).

Should I adapt my whole API to leverage Nuxt server middleware now? - You could do this, but I would rather not recommend it, as pointed out in a recent article. It’s a great solution for simple and small APIs, but as soon as complexity or the request count increases, better go with own API servers (not only because of performance, also because of better scalability and no “single point of failure”).

 Closing remarks

I hope you enjoyed the article! If so it’d be cool if you could spread the word ☺️

Questions left? Critics? Hit me up on Twitter (@TheAlexLichter) or write me a mail (blog at lichter dot io). I’m curious to hear from you!


  • 2019-09-06 10:30:20

    ffmpeg错误码

    AVERROR_BSF_NOT_FOUND = -1179861752 AVERROR_BUG = -558323010 AVERROR_DECODER_NOT_FOUND = -1128613112 AVERROR_DEMUXER_NOT_FOUND = -1296385272 AVERROR_ENCODER_NOT_FOUND = -1129203192 AVERROR_EOF = -541478725 AVERROR_EXIT = -1414092869 AVERROR_FILTER_NOT_FOUND = -1279870712 AVERROR_INVALIDDATA = -1094995529 AVERROR_MUXER_NOT_FOUND = -1481985528 AVERROR_OPTION_NOT_FOUND = -1414549496 AVERROR_PATCHWELCOME = -1163346256 AVERROR_PROTOCOL_NOT_FOUND = -1330794744 AVERROR_STREAM_NOT_FOUND = -1381258232 AVERROR_BUG2 = -541545794 AVERROR_UNKNOWN = -1313558101

  • 2019-09-08 09:05:54

    MyBatis Generator 插件的拓展插件包

    应该说使用Mybatis就一定离不开MyBatis Generator这款代码生成插件,而这款插件自身还提供了插件拓展功能用于强化插件本身,官方已经提供了一些拓展插件,本项目的目的也是通过该插件机制来强化Mybatis Generator本身,方便和减少我们平时的代码开发量。

  • 2019-09-08 09:09:48

    mybatis-generator自动生成代码插件使用详解

      mybatis-generator是一款在使用mybatis框架时,自动生成model,dao和mapper的工具,很大程度上减少了业务开发人员的手动编码时间,今天自己研究了一下,也分享一下使用心得供大家简单使用。

  • 2019-09-08 15:09:14

    IDEA从mapper.java跳转到mapper.xml

    在IDEA中写项目后台的时候,从controller到service到mapper到dao,都可以直接跳转,但是mapper.java到mapper.xml就需要自行寻找,为了开发方便,安装相应插件--mybais

  • 2019-09-08 21:44:15

    git pre-commit hook failed 解决办法

    今天在上传项目的时候在commit阶段遇到一个问题,无论是在Sourcetree上传还是用命令git commit -m 'xxx'都报了一下错误:

  • 2019-09-08 21:45:31

    git index.lock

    因是在你进行某些比较费时的git操作时自动生成,操作结束后自动删除,相当于一个锁定文件,目的在于防止对一个目录同时进行多个操作。 有时强制关闭进行中的git操作,这个文件没有被自动删除,之后你就无法进行其他操作,必须手动删除,进入.git文件中删除,打开显示隐藏文件。如果没有看见.git文件夹,可以直接用命令rm -f ./.git/index.lock。之后就可以正常使用。 ———————————————— 版权声明:本文为CSDN博主「李瑞豪」的原创文章,遵循 CC 4.0 BY-SA 版权协议,转载请附上原文出处链接及本声明。 原文链接:https://blog.csdn.net/qq_39520417/article/details/81941111